Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAkelola, Ruth Wamatuba
dc.contributor.authorEdwin, Wamukoya
dc.contributor.authorJane, Situma
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-03T06:15:17Z
dc.date.available2024-09-03T06:15:17Z
dc.date.issued2023-10-14
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.sciencepublishinggroup.com/article/10.11648/j.sjph.20231105.14
dc.identifier.urihhtsp://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjph.20231105.14
dc.identifier.urihttp://ir-library.mmust.ac.ke:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/2963
dc.description.abstractGood Nutrition optimizes benefits of ART and increases treatment adherence, both prolong lives of PLHIV (NASCOP, 2014), without proper care and management it exposes them to non-communicable diseases (NCDs). Key objective; To determine the effect of food-based nutrition intervention on the management of NCDs among PLHIV in Busia. Design was experimental using randomized control trial approach. Control group- 30 subjects fed on Plumpy ‘nut while treatment group – 30 subjects fed on Power Porridge (PROLCARMIV), for 60 days. Subjects purposively selected from the Comprehensive Care Clinic (CCC) in Busia County referral hospital- Kenya, further randomly selected using simple random sampling, assigned equally to each group. Data collected using a structured questionnaire analyzed using Social Package for Statistical Sciences version 26. Prevalence of NCDS; 75.5% hypertension; 15.6% Diabetes and 8.9% heart disease; post-intervention BMI for intervention group increased; Laboratory analyses; Hb post–intervention results; mean levels were higher in intervention group (M=13.62, SD=2.69) p-value = 0.487 compared to control group (12.69, SD=1.24), p value= 0.471. RBS were higher in control group (5.96, SD=1.70), p value= <0.001, intervention group (M=5.79, SD=1.02), p-value = <0.001. Post-intervention liver function test; TB, AST, and ALT showed higher SD indicating variability. Lipid profile; showed TC mean (4.39 (0.95) for control group; a mean 3.78 (0.94) intervention group: p=0.017; HDL -control group mean 1.58 (0.57): 1.14 (0.53) intervention group p=0.036: TG - control group mean 1.50 (0.50): intervention group p= 0.017: mean 1.14: (0.46): LDL mean 2.26 (0.66) control group: 1.43 (0.42): intervention group p= 0.041: all exhibited significant decreases. Kidney function tests; no significant differences between the two groups. Conclusion; Compliance for PROLCARMIV; 82.5%, attracting uptake of CCC services. PROLCARMIV can manage NCDs among PLHIV, answering the alternative hypothesis, this would inform Policy.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherScience Journal of Public Healthen_US
dc.subjectEffect, PROLCARMIV, Management, Non-Communicable, Diseases, People, Living, HIV,County Hospitalen_US
dc.titleEffect of PROLCARMIV on Management of Non-Communicable Diseases Among People Living with HIV in Busia, County Hospital-Kenyaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record