Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ir-library.mmust.ac.ke:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/1944
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNadio, E. Clement-
dc.contributor.authorAgevi, Humphrey-
dc.contributor.authorObiri, John-
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-31T08:30:27Z-
dc.date.available2021-12-31T08:30:27Z-
dc.date.issued2020-11-05-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.9734/CJAST/2020/v39i3331026-
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.journalcjast.com/index.php/CJAST/article/view/31026-
dc.identifier.urihttp://ir-library.mmust.ac.ke:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/1944-
dc.description.abstractAims: This study sought to determine the effects of P. juliflora on the abundance and relative diversity of other forage species in Turkana County. Study Design: Ecological data collection entailed cross-sectional surveys across riverine and non-riverine ecosystems. Place and Duration of Study: The study was undertaken in three sub-counties within Turkana County namely Turkana Central, Turkana West and Turkana South between 15th January to 17th May, 2020. Methodology: Sampling plots were used to collect plant abundance data from the various parts of the study area. The plots were of three types; main plots of 30 m× 40 m (1200 m2), sub-plots of 5 m × 2 m (10 m2) and square quadrats of 1 m×1 m (1 m2). The sub-plots and quadrats were nested within the main plots which were in turn laid down along transect belts. The transects of width 40 m and 400m in length were laid down in two main habitats (riverine and non-riverine) of the three sub-counties. Control plots were also laid in non P. juliflora sites. Results: Prosopis juliflora was the most abundant species covering about 63% of the sampled individuals (N=6390). This was followed by Acacia tortilis at 18% while Acacia mellifera was the least. There was significant difference in abundance between sites and among counties (p˂0.05). The Shannon diversity index (H´) in areas with Prosopis juliflora ranged between 0.40-1.27 while in areas without Prosopis juliflora (or Control) it ranged between 1.5-2.1, indicating high diversity in the areas without P. juliflora compared to areas colonized by it. Prosopis juliflora was also high in the riverine areas compared to non-riverine areas across the three sub counties. Results show that Prosopis juliflora has invaded vast areas especially the riverine ecosystem leading to a decline in the population of key forage species and thus threatening the socio-economic livelihoods of Turkana County. Conclusion: Prosopis juliflora was the most abundant and dominant plant species in both the riverine and non-riverine sites. The study also showed that P. juliflora has led to the decreased plant species richness and diversity in the area because of its invasive nature.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherCurrent Journal of Applied Science and Technologyen_US
dc.subjectImpacts, Prosopis, juliflora, Abundance, Species, Diversity, Forageen_US
dc.titleImpacts of Prosopis juliflora on Abundance and Species Diversity of Forage Species in Turkana County, Kenyaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.